Submit a credible SE artifact set without burning two engineers' weeks.
Your proposal deadline is 3–6 weeks out. Your two senior engineers are already covering the technical narrative + cost volume + past- performance writeup. The SE artifacts are the “someone has to do this” line item. Drop your brief into Blueprint and ship the 35-artifact SE pack the reviewer expects — Phase 1.1 through PDR readiness — in 10–15 minutes per run. Iterate as your technical answer evolves; ship the pack with the rest of the response.
Free tier · no card required · Team tier when the solicitation cycle starts.
The math against a 6-week solicitation cycle.
Phase 1.1 through Phase D — what the reviewer expects from a serious team.
Cover the solicitation + internal designs + change control through PDR.
Iterate as the technical answer evolves. The per-run cost is rounding error.
1.5% of one fractional SE consultant engagement. The math is the close.
A fractional SE consultant for the solicitation runs $5K–$50K and takes 2–4 weeks. The Team tier is 1.5% of one consultant engagement and runs in your team’s loop, not theirs.
What's in the proposal SE pack.
35 artifacts across the NASA SE Handbook §6.7 phases. Solicitations call out Phase 1.1–1.4 deliverables under different names — Operational Concept, System Requirements Document, Allocated Baseline trace, Risk Register — Blueprint generates them all. Standards exports (OMG ReqIF 1.2, SysML 2, SysML 1.x XMI) drop into your customer’s existing toolchain.
Stakeholder Expectations
- ·Stakeholder register (warfighter / PM / sponsor)
- ·Needs / Goals / Objectives tree
- ·MOEs against contract criteria
- ·ConOps / Operational scenarios
- ·Constraints register (cost / schedule / regulatory)
System Requirements Document
- ·Requirements (Functional / Performance / Interface / Constraint)
- ·Verification method per shall
- ·MOPs traced to MOEs
- ·TPMs with PDR / CDR targets
- ·Compliance matrix backing
Allocated Baseline
- ·Functional architecture
- ·Component breakdown
- ·DTRs (Derived Technical Requirements)
- ·Interface register + ICDs
- ·Allocated baseline trace
Design Solution
- ·Design specs per component
- ·Interface specs (build-to)
- ·Trade studies + rationale
- ·Risk register (likelihood × impact + mitigations)
- ·Verification + Validation activities
- ·Enabling products plan (GSE / test fixtures)
Phase-Gate Readiness
- ·SRR / SDR / PDR / CDR readiness assessments
- ·Per gate: entry status, exit status, blocking findings, recommendation
- ·Matches what your customer's PM panel scores against
Deep dives.
Three solicitation contexts, with the rubric mapping your evaluator scores against.
SBIR Phase I SE deliverables
What Phase I reviewers expect — ConOps, SRD, decomposition, risk, V&V, Phase II transition readiness — mapped to the rubric.
AFWERX response SE template
AFWERX rubric mapping — warfighter relevance, technical approach, transition path. Same SE pack, USAF framing.
PDR-ready artifacts in a day
What Handbook §6.7.4 entry criteria require + the Phase-D readiness assessment with per-criterion met / partial / unmet status.
Won't this sound like generic AI to the reviewer?
Blueprint is brief-conditioned. Every artifact is generated from your brief — your mission language, your technical choices, your stakeholder names. The citations make it traceable to your exact wording. The Handbook discipline is borrowed; the engineering content is yours.
The bundle ships as `.zip` of markdown. Edit any artifact directly before submission — fix the customer’s preferred phrasing, add your engineer’s judgment call, sharpen the trade-study rationale. Blueprint produces the draft your team would have written in week 2 of authoring; you sign off in week 3.
Same rule any reviewer applies: does the artifact set demonstrate the team understood the problem? Cite-grounded output + edits in your team’s voice answers yes.
Pricing for proposal cycles.
3 runs per month
Validate on a throwaway brief
No card required
100 projects per month
One solicitation cycle
If the team runs 1–2 responses / quarter
500 projects per month
Solicitation + designs + change-control
Through PDR + into CDR
Team covers the solicitation response + the internal iterations + the change-control cycle through PDR. 500 runs is more than most teams will use; the headroom lets you iterate as the technical answer evolves without watching the counter.
Get to a draft pack today.
- 1
Sign up free
Email + Google or GitHub. No card. ~30 seconds. Add your two co-founders as collaborators on the project.
- 2
Upload the solicitation brief
The PWS / SOW / NOFO document, plus your technical narrative draft if you have one. 1,500–3,000 words is the sweet spot. Blueprint reads both as the source for citations.
- 3
Click Generate, iterate
11 agents work the brief in 10–15 minutes. RunComplete is where you download the bundle + the standards exports. Iterate as your technical answer evolves; each run is $0.17 LLM cost.
Questions proposal teams ask.
Will the reviewer downgrade us for using AI-generated SE artifacts?
Reviewers downgrade on substance, not generation method. The graph schema mirrors the NASA SE Handbook §6.7 product model exactly — Stakeholders, Needs/Goals/Objectives, MOEs/MOPs/TPMs, ConOps scenarios, requirements, decomposition, design, V&V, phase gates. Every claim cites the source brief chunk. If a reviewer challenges traceability, you point at the citation. If they challenge structure, you point at the Handbook section.
What if the solicitation calls for SysML or a specific notation?
Blueprint exports OMG SysML 2 (textual + KerML JSON) and SysML 1.x XMI (1.5 / 1.6 / 1.7 profiles). Drop the export into Cameo Magic Systems, Capella, or Rhapsody. ReqIF 1.2 export covers DOORS NG / Polarion / Jama. Federation, not replacement — the reviewer sees the artifacts in their tool of choice.
Can our 3-person team collaborate on the same project?
Yes — Team tier supports multiple users per project. One engineer iterates on the brief while another reviews the previous run's bundle. Comments + revisions land in the same project. Versioned runs let you compare iterations.
How does this fit with our compliance matrix?
Blueprint emits a Requirements doc with verification method per shall, plus a Phase-D readiness assessment per gate. Pull the requirements + verification methods into your customer's compliance matrix; the citation IDs give you traceability back to source. Hand-edit any rows that need contractual framing your brief didn't carry.
What's the IP / data security story for SBIR / AFWERX briefs?
Your brief is private to your account; Blueprint does not train on your data and no shared dataset exists. LLM providers (DeepSeek / Gemini / OpenAI) are called via API per their published data-retention terms; see the subprocessors page for the full list. SOC 2 + ITAR-eligible deployment is roadmapped post-MVP per the engineering roadmap — not available today. If your solicitation requires SOC 2 today, contact us about controlled-tier early access.
What about classified or CUI material?
Don't upload classified material. Blueprint is hosted SaaS. CUI / ITAR-controlled material requires the controlled tier (months 6–9 roadmap). For pre-award proposal work on unclassified material — including non-CUI parts of a CUI program — Blueprint is fine.
Ship the SE pack alongside the rest of the response.
Free tier. No card. 3 runs a month. Run one against your current solicitation’s draft brief and compare what Blueprint produced to what your team would have built. The math is in the comparison.
Start free →